Business Law, Commercial Litigation and International Business Law

We offer over 25 years experience in business, business law, commercial litigation and international business. As well as, corporate representation and business formation, including contracts and intellectual property.



Business Law, Commercial Litigation and International Business Law

04 June 2012

Boomers Who Start Businesses: The Next Great Generation of Entrepreneurs






Don't be fooled by baby-faced Mark Zuckerberg: Contrary to popular opinion, 20-somethings aren't the only ones responsible for successful startups these days. Sure, we may be obsessed with youth, but don't forget, it's also wasted on the young, which is why a growing number of people are starting businesses in their 50s, 60s and even 70s. For baby boomers, with newfound free time and either financial freedom or financial insecurity on their hands, the entrepreneurial path has become more appealing, more viable and more rewarding.
"When people become middle-aged, they have experience, knowledge, savings -- they just have this fire in the belly to create something, to make it big before they retired," says Vivek Wadhwa, an academic, writer and entrepreneur. "They worry if they don't start something now, they'll be left out, so they take the plunge."
In 2008, at the height of the entrepreneurial youth renaissance, Wadhwa released breakthrough research that showed the number of founders older than 50 was double the number of founders younger than 25, and the number of founders over age 60 was also twice the number of founder under 20. The average age of male founders was 40, and female founders' average age was 41. In fact, Wadhwa's research revealed that the highest rate of entrepreneurial activity had shifted to boomers in the 55-64 age group. That trend continued through 2009, according to a Kaufmann Foundation study released last year, and Wadhwa says he expects the boom in boomer entrepreneurship to continue through 2012.
"We suspect the age of entrepreneurs is actually increasing," Wadhwa says. "When we did the study, it created a lot of controversy, because it went against the stereotypes in Silicon Valley. The perception here is that only the young can innovate and that any kid out of school can build a Facebook. People here believe it's all about youth, but we found that isn't the case."
Ageism in the entrepreneurial community is a fairly recent development. Wadhwa points out that Ben Franklin discovered electricity at 46 and invented bifocals after age 70, Sam Walton built Walmart in his mid-40s and Ray Kroc built McDonald's in his early 50s. Wadhwa finds it ironic Silicon Valley may scorn boomers, while its very icon of innovation, Steve Jobs, introduced the iMac, iTunes, iPod, iPhone and iPad all after age 45. "When he was young, he got kicked out of Apple," and some of his greatest innovations came "with age and maturity," Wadhwa says.
'Fifty Is The New 30'
Rather than the dominion of the young, innovation is a product of young minds, and the baby boom generation has that to spare. "Fifty is the new 30," says Rieva Lesonsky, founder and CEO of GrowBiz Media and a member of the HuffPost Small Business Board of Directors. "Boomers don't feel or act their chronological age. We have a lot of good years ahead of us, and we don't want to sit idly on the sidelines. We'd be bored -- and many of us would simply run out of money."
"Part of the baby boomer mentality is to think younger and break out of the box as much as possible," says Steve Strauss, columnist, author of "The Small Business Bible" and also a member of the HuffPost Small Business Board of Directors. "People are living longer and healthier. I'm not surprised that boomers are changing the way we look at retirement."
The increase of boomer startups, according to Lesonsky, has been fueled by the recession, which has created a number of "reluctant entrepreneurs." "Many boomers lost their jobs in the recession," she explains. "While hiring is picking up again, it's not likely boomers are going to get hired. Due to their experience and age, they simply cost employers more to hire, both from a salary and cost-of-benefits perspective."
Outright age discrimination in a competitive job market may also be pushing those over 50 toward entrepreneurship. "For many boomers, self-employment is the best or the only option," Strauss says. "Getting a second or third job later in life is not an easy thing to do, and the economy changed a lot of plans for a lot of people, whether they thought they were going to have a 401(k) or sell their home and cash out their equity."
Even if they started businesses out of necessity, many boomers are finding entrepreneurship to be a good fit. According to a survey by MBO Partners, which provides services to the independent contractor market, 30 percent of the booming independent worker market are boomers, and 10 percent are even older. Only 8 percent of independent contractors ages 50 to 64 and fewer than 1 percent of those 65 or older are seeking traditional employment, and 86 percent of boomers and 96 percent those who are 65 or older are highly satisfied or satisfied working independently.
'Golden Age'
While it has been four years since Wadhwa's study popped a hole in the youth bubble, the effects have been like a slow leak, and he believes boomers still have not gotten their due respect. "In Silicon Valley, it's gotten even tougher," he says. "It's probably why the Silicon Valley venture-capital system is in decline, because they are missing the target. And we need all the innovation we can get right now."
In fact, the support of this demographic may be the key to economic recovery. "It's 'cool' to talk about young entrepreneurs, so yes, I think older entrepreneurs don't get the attention they deserve," Lesonsky says. "I do believe Gen Y is inherently the most entrepreneurial in U.S. history, but I think a lot of that interest was planted by their entrepreneur parents. Once the economy starts picking up for real, I think boomer business owners will get a bit more attention, especially if the businesses they start, grow and contribute to the economic recovery.
"This era of entrepreneurship being embraced by the mature and the young is new territory," Lesonsky adds. "Both age demographics have a lot to learn from and share with one another. If we do this right, we could be entering another 'golden age' of entrepreneurship, where smart, educated people embrace business ownership partly out of necessity, partly fueled by their dreams, and partly to grab control of their lives."
Get Alerts
CONTRIBUTE
TO THIS STORY
  • Send Corrections
  • Send us a Link
  • Contact us
  • Send a Tip
  • Send Photos/Videos
  • Comment

31 May 2012

Who Truly Speaks for Small Businesses?

FYI Only:

Who Truly Speaks for Small Businesses?

By John Stoehr
May 22, 2012

Everyone knows that small businesses hate President Obama’s historic healthcare reform law, right? At least that’s what the nation’s leading small-business advocacy group would have you believe.

Joining 26 states, the National Federation of Independent Business challenged the law all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in March. It claimed the “individual mandate” is unconstitutional and would bankrupt small businesses with unnecessary costs.

Yet while the NFIB claims its multimillion-dollar lawsuit is on behalf of job creators and small businesses everywhere, it’s unclear whether small businesses genuinely support the NFIB position. A close look at its record suggests that the NFIB uses the politically valuable mantle of small business to pursue an agenda that may take its cues from elsewhere.

For one thing, many of its 340,000 members, most of whom employ 20 or fewer workers, have already benefited from the law. According to a March report in the Wall Street Journal, members have seen costs go down thanks to tax credits that were built into the law. Small firms in industries like advertising have also been able to compete with large national companies for talented employees. As one member told the WSJ: “[The NFIB is] doing a very big disservice to their members” by opposing the healthcare law.

For another, the NFIB has a record of lobbying for issues that benefit big businesses, not necessarily small ones. Consider a widespread state tax loophole that lets big-box retailers like Wal-Mart and Home Depot transfer income to out-of-state subsidiaries. This loophole often allows the chain retailers to pay no state income tax, while small businesses do. Yet the NFIB has fought against closing such loopholes.

Moreover, small businesses generally favor some kind of regulation, because such standards often make them more competitive with big companies. The NFIB is opposed to regulation on principle, but it also claims, as many Republicans do, that the threat of regulation on entrepreneurs and job creators – they have a habit of calling it “regulatory uncertainty” – has kept businesses from hiring and thus from stimulating the economy. But observers across the political spectrum say this is a canard. Regulation isn’t preventing businesses from hiring.Poor sales are.

Perhaps it is no surprise that the NFIB fights for issues that the Republican Party as well as big corporations also fight for: deregulation, lower taxes and tort reform. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the NFIB’s political action committee has raised over $20 million since 1998. In 2010, nearly 94 percent of contributions went to Republicans. This year it’s 98 percent. It spent $9.5 million lobbying against the healthcare reform bill in 2010. And last year, the NFIB received $3.7 million from Crossroads GPS, according to B! loomberg. Crossroads GPS is a non-profit with close ties to Karl Rove, the political adviser of George W. Bush.

Given the partisan affiliations and positions, it’s unsurprising that other groups who claim to speak for small business, such as Family Values at Work, cast a gimlet-eye at the NFIB. So do small-business owners and small-business advocacy groups. Frank Knapp, president of the South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce, called the NFIB a “small-business pretender” and “lapdog” of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. In April, J. Kelly Conklin, a New Jersey cabinetmaker, wrote in the Hill: “Whether we’re talking about health care or taxes (or both at the same time), NFIB always seems to side with the! big fellas – big insurance, big banking, big business – not little guys like me. Why? I don’t know.”

Perhaps few do.

What’s more certain is that calling yourself a small-business group while serving the interests of big business has political advantages.

A Gallup poll showed most Americans trust small business to create jobs, more than they do large corporations or the U.S. Congress. That kind of public opinion explains why the major parties can’t agree on anything unless it has something to do with small business.

And it explains why the NFIB, in speaking for small business, hopes to be seen as speaking for the American people – even though, if the Supreme Court overturns the healthcare law, it’s the American people and their trusted small business who may suffer most.

PHOTO: Buttons reading “Repeal Obamacare” are displayed at the American Conservative Union’s annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington, February 9, 2012. 
 REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Article taken from The Great Debate - Reuters blog - Great Debate
URL to article: Ariticle - Who Truly Speaks for Small Business?



25 May 2012

BOOK: "Inside the Firm" - Synopsis

 
Chapter One lists and discusses important reasons for using an attorney in everyday life and business matters.  These reasons include:

  • ·         The essential relationship of a good attorney to the legal system,
  • ·         Learning to practice preventive legal medicine,
  • ·         Avoiding having a fool for a client,
  • ·         Avoiding serious errors in document review and preparation, and
  • ·         Taking advantage of the greater availability and affordability of attorneys in today’s dynamic business world.

Additional reasons for using an attorney discussed in this chapter are:

  • ·         To help you succeed,
  • ·         To add credibility to your business deal,
  • ·         To protect yourself from sharp business practitioners,
  • ·         To maintain objectivity,
  • ·         To take advantage to the lawyer’s club, and
  • ·         To convert a bad case into a good case.

Product Description
This book began as a series of notes for the author's radio show "Law Talk", aired on a local financial news station. The topics were placed into chapters.  Here are some: Why Use a Lawyer? When to Call a Lawyer? How To Find a Lawyer? What To Look For In a Lawyer? The Consultation. Things to Do and Avoid. Understanding Law and of course, The Bills—and there are other chapters filled with important information.

About the Author
Donald W. Hudspeth has been a promoter, business organizer and advisor from the age of nineteen. He helped found, solicited investors and organized a pinto bean processing plant before being old enough to vote. Mr. Hudspeth also founded a dynamic and successful disco-bar and real estate chain in the 1970s and a chain of mall stores in the 1980s. The author provided management consulting and financial administration to other companies until he began attending law school at the age of 36. His current firm is known for its trademark "The Business of Our Firm is Business." 


Latest Book Review: "Good Information"